Central European Papers 2021, 9(2):9-44 | DOI: 10.25142/cep.2022.001

The genesis of the EU’s rule of law mechanisms applied against Central European Member States

Ákos Bence Gát1
1 European Strategy Research Institute (EUSTRAT) of the Eötvös József Research Center, National University of Public Service (NKE)

European rule of law criticism towards some Central and Eastern European Member States led European institutions to put in place several instruments which aim at controlling EU countries in the name of the rule of law. The analysis of each instrument as well as of their interaction shows that their structure and workings differ depending on the institution which created them, and generally tend to increase the political and institutional power of the creating institution.

Keywords: rule of law, European Union, Central Europe, European institutions, institutional  power

Received: May 25, 2021; Revised: September 13, 2021; Accepted: January 6, 2022; Published: April 13, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bence Gát Á. The genesis of the EU’s rule of law mechanisms applied against Central European Member States. Central European Papers. 2021;9(2):9-44. doi: 10.25142/cep.2022.001.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Council of the European Union, Press release nr. 16936/14, 3362nd Council meeting, General Affairs. Brussels, 16th December 2014, online: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16936-2014-INIT/en ((Downloaded 3 January 2021).
    2. Council of the European Union, Opinion of the Legal Service. Commission's Communication on a new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law: - compatibility with the Treaties. Brussels, 27th May 2014, online: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10296-2014-INIT/en ((Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    3. European Parliament resolution of 3 July 2013 on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary (pursuant to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012). Strasbourg, 2013, online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2013-0315+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (Downloaded 30 December 2020.
    4. European Parliament resolution of 25 October 2016 with recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, Strasbourg, 2016, online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0409_EN.html (Downloaded 30 December 2020).
    5. European Parliament resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary, Strasbourg, 2017, online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0216_EN.pdf? redirect (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    6. European Parliament resolution of 12 September 2018 on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (2017/2131(INL)), online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018IP0340 (Downloaded 30 December 2020).
    7. European Parliament resolution of 14 November 2018 on the need for a comprehensive EU mechanism for the protection of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0456_EN.html (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    8. European Commission, press release nr. IP/12/24, 17th January 2012, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_12_24 (Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    9. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. Strasbourg, 11th March 2014, online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52014DC0158 (Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    10. European Commission, press release, College Orientation Debate on recent developments in Poland and the Rule of Law Framework: Questions & Answers. Brussels, 13th January 2016, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_16_62 (Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    11. European Commission, press release, Commission Opinion on the Rule of Law in Poland and the Rule of Law Framework: Questions & Answers. Brussels, 1st June 2016, online: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-2017_en.htm (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    12. European Commission, press release, Rule of Law: Commission issues recommendation to Poland. Brussels, 27th July 2016, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_16_2643 (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    13. European Commission, press release, Rule of Law: Commission discusses latest developments and issues complementary Recommendation to Poland. Brussels, 21st December 2016, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_16_4476 (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    14. European Commission, press release, European Commission acts to preserve the rule of law in Poland. Brussels, 26th July 2017, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_2161(Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    15. European Commission, Follow up to the European Parliament resolution with recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, adopted by the Commission on 17 January 2017. Brussels, 17th January 2017, online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27630&j=0&l=en (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    16. European Commission, Monitoring the application of European Union law, Brussels, 2017, p. 29, online: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2017/EN/COM-2017-370-F1-EN-MAINPART-1.PDF (Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    17. European Commission, press release nr. IP/17/1982, 13th July 2017, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1982 (Downloaded 31December 2020).
    18. European Commission, press release nr. IP/17/1952, 13th July 2017, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1952 (Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    19. European Commission, Proposal for a regulation nr. 2018/0136 (COD) of the European Commission on the protection of the Union's budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States, 2nd May 2018, online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-ontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018PC0324 (Downloaded 2 January 2021).
    20. European Commission, communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strengthening the rule of law within the Union. A blueprint for action, Brussels, 17th July 2019, online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A343%3AFIN (Downloaded 31 December 2020).
    21. European Commission press release, Strengthening the rule of law through increased awareness, an annual monitoring cycle and more effective enforcement rule of law cycle, CENTRAL EUROPEAN PAPERS 2021/ IX / 2 41 17th July 2019, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_4169 (Downloaded 6 January 2021).
    22. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; 2020 Rule of Law Report; The rule of law situation in the European Union, COM/2020/580 final. Brussels, 30 September 2020, online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1602583951529&uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0580 (Downloaded 6 January 2021).
    23. European Commission, Rule of Law Country Reports 2020, online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rule_of_law_2020_country_reports_2_web.pdf (Downloaded 8 January 2021).
    24. 2020 Rule of Law Report - communication and country chapters, online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2020-rule-law-report-communication-and-countrychapters_en (Downloaded 8 January 2021).
    25. European Commission, Rule of Law Country Reports 2020, Abstract, online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rule_of_law_2020_country_reports_2_web.pdf (Downloaded 8 January 2021).
    26. Jean-Claude Juncker, opening statement in the European Parliament plenary session in Strasbourg, A new start for Europe, 15th July 2014.
    27. Letter from the German, Dutch, Finnish and Danish foreign ministers to the President of the European Commission, 6th March 2013, online: https://www.eerstekamer.nl/eu/documenteu/_brief_nederland_duitsland/f=/vji8oh6slx9o. pdf ((Downloaded 30 December 2020).
    28. Opening remarks of First Vice-President Frans Timmermans: College readout on grave concerns about the clear risks for independence of the judiciary in Poland, 19th July 2017, online: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-17-2084_en.pdf (Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    29. Opening remarks of First Vice-President Frans Timmermans, Readout of the European Commission discussion on the Rule of Law in Poland. Brussels, 20th December 2017, online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detailen/SPEECH_17_5387 ((Downloaded 5 January 2021).
    30. Presidency Conclusions - Evaluation of the Annual Rule of Law Dialogue. Brussels, 19th November 2019, online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/41394/st14173-en19.pdf ((Downloaded 5 August 2021).
    31. Report on the Rule of Law Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25-26 March 2011) Strasbourg, 4th April 2011, 4, online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webfor ms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLAD(2011)003rev-e ((Downloaded 18 January 2021).
    32. BALÁZS, Fekete: Alternatív kommentár az EUSZ. 7. Cikkéhez, in: Közjogi Szemle, 2016, 2. Szám.
    33. BÁLINT, Ablonczy: Conversations on the Fundamental Law of Hungary, Interviews with József Szájer, Hungarian Member of European Parliament, and Gergely Gulyás, Member of Parliament in Hungary [Sur les traces de la constitution hongroise. Entretiens avec József Szájer et Gergely Gulyás]. Budapest: Elektromédia, 2012.
    34. BERND, Schlipphak - TREIB, Oliver: Playing the blame game on Brussels: the domestic political effects of EU interventions against democratic backsliding, in: Journal of European Public Policy, 2016, 3, 361. Go to original source...
    35. BERTRAND, Mathieu: Le droit contre la démocratie? Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ, collection Forum, 2017.
    36. DIDIER, Georgakakis, - JAY Rowell (editors). The Field of Eurocracy, Mapping EU Actors and Professionals. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Go to original source...
    37. DOBRY, Michel: Le jeu du consensus, in Pouvoirs, 38, September 1986, 47-66, online: http://www.revue-pouvoirs.fr/Le-jeu-du-consensus.html (Downloaded 7. January 2021).
    38. Furedi , Frank: Populism and the European Culture Wars: The Conflict of Values between Hungary and the EU, London: Routledge, 2017. Go to original source...
    39. HASSENTEUFEL, Patrick : Sociologie politique: l'action publique. Paris: Armand Colin, Collection U Sociologie, Malakoff, 2nd edition, 2011. Go to original source...
    40. CHRONOWSKI, Nóra: Jogállamiság-kontroll az uniós közjogban: üveggyöngyjáték? Értelmezési lehetőségek az Európai Tanács költségvetési konklúziói apropóján, in: Jogtudományi Közlöny, 2020, 75, 9.
    41. KOCHENOV, Dimitry - MAGEN, Amichai - PECH, Laurent, Introduction: The Great Rule of Law Debate in the EU, in Journal of Common Market Studies, 2016, 5, 1045-1049. Go to original source...
    42. KAPONYI, Erzsébet Kardosné: Az alapvető jogok és a jogállamiság védelmének aktuális kérdései az Európai Unióban 1., in: Köz-Gazdaság, 2016, 3, 187-195.
    43. KAPONYI, Erzsébet Kardosné: Az alapvető jogok és a jogállamiság védelmének aktuális kérdései az Európai Unióban 2., in: Köz-Gazdaság, 2017, 1, 135-163.
    44. LÁNCOS, Petra Lea: A Bizottság közleménye a jogállamiság erősítésének új, uniós keretéről, in: Pázmány Law Working Papers, 2014, 5. szám
    45. MAGNETTE, Paul : Le régime politique de l'Union européenne. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2006.
    46. PECH, Laurent: The Rule of Law in the EU: The Evolution of the Treaty Framework and Rule of Law Toolbox. Reconnect, Working Paper No. 7, 30th March 2020, online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3608661 (Downloaded 4. August 2021). Go to original source...
    47. SEDELMEIER, Ulrich: Political safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU: the limits of material sanctions and the scope of social pressure, in: Journal of European Public Policy, 2016, 3, 337-351. Go to original source...
    48. SCHOPFLIN, György: Politics, Illusions, Fallacies. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press, 2012
    49. TÉGLÁSI, András: Az emberi jogok védelmének nemzetközi rendszere [The International System of the Protection of Human Rights], in ZSÓFIA BENDE, IVÁN HALÁSZ (editors), Összehasonlító alkotmányjog. Fejezetek az alkotmány, az állam, az államszervezet és az alapvető jogok témaköréből, Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem Közigazgatástudományi Kar, 2014.
    50. Trócsányi, László: The Dilemmas of Drafting the Hungarian Fundamental Law: Constitutional identity and European integration, Passau: Schenk Verlag GmbH, 2016.
    51. VARGA, AndráS Zs.: From Ideal to Idol? The Concept of the Rule of Law, Budapest: Dialóg Campus, 2019.
    52. VARGA, Judit (editor): (Pre)judgement in Brussels: rule of law concepts in a contested procedure: information note to the General Affairs Council of the European Union by the Hungarian Government on the Resolution on Hungary adopted by the European Parliament on 12 September 2018. Budapest: Magyar Közlöny Lap- és Könyvkiadó, 2019.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content